[Kamailio-Devel] dropping 200ok?
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Fri Oct 24 15:30:04 CEST 2008
This is somehtin gI like to since years.
Check reply and if there is no matching transcation I want to drop it
(regardsless of the response code)
For this "drop" must work for every response code
regards
klaus
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> wondering if makes sense to drop 200ok, maybe other final replies, too.
>
> Discussing with some folks around, the following use case came up:
>
> INVITE
> restart
> 200ok
>
> Due to restart, INVITE transaction in memory is lost, therefore proper
> accounting is compromised.
>
> The 200OK is going just fine based on Via and call completes. In this
> situation, something like:
>
> onreply_route {
> if(!t_check_trans())
> {
> drop;
> }
> }
>
> could protect. Is anyone seeing side effects or workarounds at least for
> accounting? Have in mind that the INVITE might have been redirected, so
> From/To headers might not be relevant for who should pay.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list