[Kamailio-Devel] SIP reply

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 11/25/08 19:42, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>   
>> On 11/25/08 18:51, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>     
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> in relation with this bug:
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2105813&group_id=139143&atid=743020 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> we should get to a conclusion, so it gets fixed soon and tested till 
>>>> next release.
>>>>
>>>> I would go for a function in TM that will use sl module send reply if 
>>>> the transaction does not exist. Other opinions?
>>>>         
>>> What about importing the signaling module from opensips? It is a 
>>> wrapper which uses either tm or sl module for the reply, depending on 
>>> if a transaction was created or not.
>>>       
>> I see no point of a new module, I suggested tm as most of the modules 
>> affected use tm API anyhow, so they do not need to bind to two modules.
>>
>> The other option of doing it in sl might be easier from the point of 
>> view of changes, they already use this module to send the reply, so 
>> would be transparent for the existing code.
>>     
>
> But wouldn't this introduce tm dependency to sl?
no, it will be something like:
- if sl is loaded, then use it when transaction does not exists
- is sl is not loaded, behave as now, throw error

Same for the other way around, with sl importing tm api.

Cheers,
Daniel

>  I have no problem with 
> that, but maybe some people which use sl only.
>
> klaus
>
>   
>> At the end, I think we can do it in both modules, so configs and rest of 
>> modules stay the same...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com