[Kamailio-Devel] SIP reply

[Klaus Darilion]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/25/08 18:51, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> in relation with this bug:
>>>
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2105813&group_id=139143&atid=743020 
>>>
>>>
>>> we should get to a conclusion, so it gets fixed soon and tested till 
>>> next release.
>>>
>>> I would go for a function in TM that will use sl module send reply if 
>>> the transaction does not exist. Other opinions?
>>
>> What about importing the signaling module from opensips? It is a 
>> wrapper which uses either tm or sl module for the reply, depending on 
>> if a transaction was created or not.
> I see no point of a new module, I suggested tm as most of the modules 
> affected use tm API anyhow, so they do not need to bind to two modules.
> 
> The other option of doing it in sl might be easier from the point of 
> view of changes, they already use this module to send the reply, so 
> would be transparent for the existing code.

But wouldn't this introduce tm dependency to sl? I have no problem with 
that, but maybe some people which use sl only.

klaus

> At the end, I think we can do it in both modules, so configs and rest of 
> modules stay the same...
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>