[OpenSER-Devel] [Serdev] Possible bug in the tm module in the presence of packet loss/branches

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Yes, but this behaviour is not relevant - the scheme takes into account 
the result of the Cancelling (487 reply), but not what the client should 
do when processing the CANCEL.

Regards,
Bogdan

Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>> Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
>>>> According to my reading yes, UAC should wait either arrival of the 
>>>> first provisional response or expiration of Timer B (doing due 
>>>> retransmits in the meantime for unreliable transports) and send 
>>>> CANCEL if provisional reply comes in.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> Yes. From figure 5 it looks like retransmissions should not be 
>>> stopped, but figures are usually not normative.
>>>   
>> As mentioned before, IMHO , figure 5 does not contain at all the case 
>> of a CANCEL generated by the UAC. So I guess it does not provide any 
>> useful info for our case.
>
> I think it is included implicitly (by receiving a 487 from the UAS).
>
> regards
> klaus
>
>