[OpenSER-Devel] [Serdev] Possible bug in the tm module in the presence of packet loss/branches
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Fri Mar 7 13:18:17 CET 2008
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
>>> According to my reading yes, UAC should wait either arrival of the
>>> first provisional response or expiration of Timer B (doing due
>>> retransmits in the meantime for unreliable transports) and send
>>> CANCEL if provisional reply comes in.
>>>
>>
>> Yes. From figure 5 it looks like retransmissions should not be
>> stopped, but figures are usually not normative.
>>
> As mentioned before, IMHO , figure 5 does not contain at all the case of
> a CANCEL generated by the UAC. So I guess it does not provide any useful
> info for our case.
I think it is included implicitly (by receiving a 487 from the UAS).
regards
klaus
More information about the Devel
mailing list