[OpenSER-Devel] [Serdev] Possible bug in the tm module in the presence of packet loss/branches

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Fri Mar 7 13:18:17 CET 2008



Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
>>> According to my reading yes, UAC should wait either arrival of the 
>>> first provisional response or expiration of Timer B (doing due 
>>> retransmits in the meantime for unreliable transports) and send 
>>> CANCEL if provisional reply comes in.
>>>     
>>
>> Yes. From figure 5 it looks like retransmissions should not be 
>> stopped, but figures are usually not normative.
>>   
> As mentioned before, IMHO , figure 5 does not contain at all the case of 
> a CANCEL generated by the UAC. So I guess it does not provide any useful 
> info for our case.

I think it is included implicitly (by receiving a 487 from the UAS).

regards
klaus




More information about the Devel mailing list