[Kamailio-Devel] Food for thought?

[Klaus Darilion]

Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
> El Tuesday 26 August 2008 09:39:30 Klaus Darilion escribió:
> 
>> 2. I am not sure if this is relevant at all for Kamailio. This draft
>> does not change the behavior of routing back the responses. Thus, if the
>> proxy forks the INVITE and both callees send 200 OK at the same time the
>> proxy still has to forward both of them to the caller.
> 
> True:
> 
>    "A 2xx response
>    received while in the "Accepted" state MUST be passed to the TU and
>    the machine remains in the "Accepted" state."
> 
> And if the TU is a proxy it must forward it upstream.
> 
> 
> 
>> One other thing is, that the draft says a statefull proxy must not
>> forward stray responses. This is a feature I want for some time now and
>> maybe we should implement it anyhow for security reasons.
> 
> It should be configurable since an implementor could want a stateless or 
> statefull proxy depending on the request type or other factors.

Currently, the problem is that you can not drop final responses in 
reply_routes. A solution would be to have drop_stray() in default reply 
route.

regards
klaus