[Devel] Re: [Users] "detached" timer

[Jerome Martin]

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:43 +0200, Jiri Kuthan wrote:

> 
> I'm hearing that the interest in porting those is rather low, I just
> expressed
> my opinion that it would do good to openser if someone took the time
> to do it.
> The overhauls have greatly improved robustness of SER after openser
> forked off. 


But can't we assume than bogdan's work on 1.2 might give OpenSER the
same level of robustness as 
SER's TM/timers overhaul, and give this code time to stabilize before
thinking of porting ? 

I mean, what would let you think that 1.2 TM/timers is less robust than
SER's 2.0 modifications ?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://openser.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070330/d7eb7982/attachment.html