[OpenSER-Devel] Re: [Devel] Re: qop support and CSeq increasing in UAC Module

[Ovidiu Sas]

Hi all,

Are there any news with respect to increasing CSeq feature?
I search the bug list but I could not find one related to to this issue.


Regards,
Ovidiu Sas


On 1/10/07, Andreas Heise <aheise at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> yes with the "fix" suggested by Thomas works with some proxies....
>
> I hope that real qop support and CSeq feature will be define as todo for
> the next roadmap instead of nice to have, because uac_auth is really needed
> often.
>
> greetings from Berlin,
> Andreas
>
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > yes, that is true - is a bit of complicated to calculate the response
> > when qop is on. Have you tried the approach suggested by Thomas? to
> > completely ignore the qop from challenge and to send the response as
> > if no qop was received......
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Andreas Heise wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I've make some tests to deeper understand qop, for this I've modify
> >> the auth_hdr.c to
> >> ignore the qop and add a static qop=auth to the outgoing
> >> authorization header, but this
> >> way wasn't successful.
> >> After review of RFC 2617 I found that in case of qop cnonce and
> >> nonce-count (nc) MUST
> >> send by the client so it's not so easy as expected.
> >>
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >> Andreas Heise schrieb:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bogdan,
> >>>
> >>> I think for the qop it could solved very quickly  if only  the auth
> >>> method will be implemented first,
> >>> because the Digest for auth should be the same as without qop
> >>> (unspecified) see page 14
> >>> in the following example....
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.softarmor.com/wgdb/docs/draft-smith-sip-auth-examples-00.txt
> >>>
> >>> so it should work as follow....
> >>>
> >>> if qop is detected, parse qop value if "auth" is allowed, if yes
> >>> send Authenticated Request as without qop,
> >>> but add qop="auth" or qop=auth ?!  ........if *only* auth-int is
> >>> allowed goto error as before ;-(
> >>>
> >>> This should make a lot of users happy......
> >>>
> >>> Am I right? Is it possible for somebody to do this soon ;-)
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> Andreas
> >>>
> >>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> >>> Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:14:51 -0800
> >>>
> >>> Hi Klaus, Hi Stefano,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> fixes to these limitations are scheduled to be done, but I'm afraid
> >>> they will not be ready for the next release - more time consuming
> >>> things are on the roll and I personally prefer to finish them before
> >>> attacking something new...
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Bogdan
> >>>
> >>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>    Stefano Capitanio wrote:
> >>>
> >>>            Hi,
> >>>
> >>>                  i would like to ask if the two known limitations of
> >>> UAC Module
> >>>        (authentication does not support qop; CSeq not increased during
> >>>        authentication) will be resolved in future releases and if
> >>>        anyone has developed a patch or is working on it.
> >>>        I wonder if the dialog module can be used to keep track of
> >>> the CSeq
> >>>    difference between the SIPclient-->openser and
> >>>    openser--->upstreamSIPcomponent and modify all messages on the fly?
> >>>    Or another idea - would i be possible to store the Cseq difference
> >>>    in the record route parameter of uac module too?
> >>>
> >>>    regards
> >>>    klaus
> >>>
> >>>    _______________________________________________
> >>> Devel mailing list
> >>> Devel at openser.org
> >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Devel mailing list
> >> Devel at openser.org
> >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>