[Devel] more im/presence thoughts

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 10/06/06 15:23, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>  > > the advantage of (2) is that it would make openser environment also a
>  > > full blown xmpp server environment, i.e., we would have two eggs (sip
>  > > and xmpp) in our basket rather than just one (sip).  further, supporting
>  > > both sip and xmpp im/presence clients for the same AoR would seem to be
>  > > easier.
>  > >   
>  > In my opinion is harder to implement a good SIP UA in jabber rather than 
>  > a XMPP component in openser. Also, for us it is easier to develop code 
>  > in openser, and presence will be still demanding a lot, now is onl the 
>  > beginning. Although the presence messages are to be quite large and 
>  > maybe to force usage of TCP, SIP seems more flexible in scalability.
>
> sip may have technical merits, but we can't decide what clients users
> choose to use and looks like there is a lot more jabber im/p users than
> sip im/p users.  therefore my point was that it would be a big advantage
> to openser if openser platform would include a full blown xmpp server
> for both c2s and s2s use.  that way we could integrate sip and xmpp
> presence info and im messages into same db tables.
>   
As I said in the reply to another message on the same topic, having a 
xmpp server integrated in openser is a good idea. We will see how our 
resources will map to this. If someone else wants to contribute with 
c2s-server-side, would be great.

Cheers,
Daniel

> -- juha
>
>
>