[Devel] acc diff

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Any other opinions on this? let us close the discussion and go for the 
coding.

Just to summarize:
    1) remove UserName RADIUS attribute from RADIUS accounting;
        Pros: it will be aligned with SQL and SYSLOG which do not log 
this value
                 minimal changes: in most of the cases, as SIP ID is the 
same as AUTH ID,
                        logging FROM will be the same
                 more flexibility in billing information - in most of 
the cases the billing ID is not
                        the UserName  value
                 less unnecessary stuff to be logged if not really required
        Contras: it may require some extra config in some cases

    2) remove Cseq, FROM URI, TO URI also - they are not dialog relevant 
and also from
                 billing point of view -> log less data and if really 
required are easy to add via
                 extra accounting.

regards,
bogdan

Juha Heinanen wrote:

>Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
>
> > IMHO this proofs that that value might not be so essentialy after 
> > all....It might be accounted for two reasons:
> >     1) dialog matching but is not the case here
> >     2) billing purpose - in this case the requirements are very various, 
> > so I do not thing we can get to common behaviour. so there are no 99% of 
> > the case where it is used as it appears only in RADIUS.
>
>i agree with this, but i have already stated my opinion.  any other
>opinions than bogdan, dan, and me?  if not, dan looses 2 to 1 :-)
>
>-- juha
>  
>