[Devel] TLS ...

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 02/23/06 11:20, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> Hello Klaus,
>>
>> I believe some of those can use same static buffer and have hooks 
>> inside the buffer to start of the pseudo-variable value and the 
>> length. Like with sip message, there is a static buffer and for each 
>> process and then the parser just links the hooks. What do you think?
>
>
> I think I will start with one static buffer, and maybe evolve it to 
> better performance (dedicated buffers for often used TLS parameters) 
> once I have more insights.
>
> I've another question regarding extra-accounting. My idea was to have 
> access to the the TLS parameters using pseudo variables and account 
> them using extra-accounting.
>
> A typical call:
>
>          Proxy
> ---INVITE-->
>              ---INVITE--->
>              <--180-------
> <--180------
>              <--200-------
> <--200------
>
>
> Which of these messages is used for accounting. E.g. if there are 2 
> TLS connections in this scenario (INVITE in & INVITE out). Which one 
> is used for accounting?
> - Is it always the connection of the received INVITE?
> - Is it possible to account parameters of the outgoing TLS connection?
Not sure right now, I have to investigate the sources to see how the 
outgoing and incoming connections can be accessed easyly from TM 
callbacks. Anyhow, introducing some shortcuts if they are not yet there 
should simplify the things.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> regards
> klaus
>