[Devel] [Fwd: Re: [Serusers] multidomain with loose routing]

[Dan Pascu]

I second this. I have around a hundred domains to deal with and adding 
them as aliases so that preloaded routes work is not nice.

On Wednesday 02 August 2006 11:57, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> This sounds reasonable for openser too. Maybe we can port the changes
> to openser.
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] multidomain with loose routing
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 01:51:39 +0200
> From: Michal Matyska <michal at iptel.org>
> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> References:
> <8b839d350608011245p73fe7393i981e0c8d5551969a at mail.gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> it is done this way in the latest CVS version. loose_route uses the
> domains stored in db table domain and checks if it is responsible for
> them.
>
> You have to set domain's module pamater db_mode to 1 (cached mode), so
> whenever you update the database, you'd need to invoke xmlrpm
> domain.reload method (or restart ser).
>
> Michal
>
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:45:36PM +0200, Weiter Leiter wrote:
> > Some UAs, when not explicitly configured with an outbound proxy (some
> > even in this), follow rfc's recommendation of sending a request with
> > a preloaded route set containing one entry, that of what they think
> > it is their outbound proxy, determined through various means.
> >
> > This is a problem when ser as a serving proxy for multiple domains
> > does the loose_route'ing: if the route entry in the message is an ip
> > address, ser will realise that it is him that must serve the request
> > and everything goes smooth. BUT if the client places a virtual domain
> > in the route set, ser is fooled to believe that it should just proxy
> > forward the request.
> >
> > Forwarding might be ok, as ser will forward to itself (suboptimal),
> > but in this case how can i prevent illegal relaying?
> >
> > How should this be elegantly dealt with?
> >
> > The most obvious answer is to add "alias"es, but i want to handle the
> > domains through domain module only. Shouldn't the domain module have
> > some functionality to load the domains as aliases (at least on demand
> > by module parameter)?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
Dan