[Kamailio-Users] TCP failover

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 11/21/08 10:05, Gawith wrote:
> Thanks guys,
>
> after inspecting the source code I already expected something like that :-(
>   
there are solutions to go even now, I had the impression you want to do 
it using failure_route...

Check this:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/tm.html#id2506624

If t_relay() returns -6 then it is the case of send error, so you can 
continue after it with something else:

t_relay("0x02");

switch($rc)
{
    case -6:
       # do your send-failover logic here
    break;
}

Cheers,
Daniel

> Cheers
>
>
> Klaus Darilion schrieb:
>   
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 11/20/08 16:05, Gawith wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> is there a way to realize TCP fail over?
>>>> With UDP, I check for 408s in the failure route and react accordingly.
>>>> With TCP, the tm modules sends out a 477 without any chance for me to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>> it is a known issue, put in discussion on devel mailing list, also 
>>> mentioned in the agenda of last devel meeting.:
>>> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/development:irc-meeting-agenda-06-11-2008 
>>>
>>> It is in my to-do list for the next release - just check devel mailing 
>>> list archive for more info:
>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/
>>>       
>> So, to answer the question - there is no way to handle this smart.
>>
>> Of course there is the dirty workaround to loop the message through 
>> Kamailio to catch the 477.
>>
>> regards
>> klaus
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com