[Kamailio-Users] registrar lookups without reason

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Wed Sep 2 09:46:47 CEST 2009


Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

 > you can put abort() in some if conditions - e.g., based on src ip, some 
 > header/uri value.

daniel,

i tried that on my own system and got a core dump from normal lookup()
call.  however, when i look at the core, it doesn't tell me much why
this normal lookup() was executed:

#0  0xb7f00424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1  0xb7c07640 in raise () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2  0xb7c09018 in abort () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3  0xb78817ae in lookup (_m=0x821c848, _t=0xb3437370 "@sC?", _s=0x0)
    at lookup.c:80
#4  0x080564e1 in do_action (a=0x81ce2a0, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:874
#5  0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81c9878, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#6  0x080578a0 in do_action (a=0x81bfda0, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:120
#7  0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81befe8, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#8  0x08057b0d in do_action (a=0x81bfe70, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:746
#9  0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81bd468, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#10 0x080578a0 in do_action (a=0x81abb80, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:120
#11 0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81aa6d8, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#12 0x08057b0d in do_action (a=0x81abc50, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:746
#13 0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81a9ed8, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#14 0x080578a0 in do_action (a=0x818ed40, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:120
#15 0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x818b8b0, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#16 0x08057b0d in do_action (a=0x818ee10, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:746
#17 0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x81877e0, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#18 0x080578a0 in do_action (a=0x8186b80, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:120
#19 0x08055518 in run_action_list (a=0x8185400, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:145
#20 0x080588d1 in run_top_route (a=0x8185400, msg=0x821c848) at action.c:120
#21 0x08086c0d in receive_msg (
    buf=0x8156180 "INVITE sip:test at test.fi SIP/2.0\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:192.98.101.10;lr;ftag=rxruz>\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.98.101.10;branch=z9hG4bK6c7e.6e29b5d.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 87.95.45.109:5074;received=87.95.45.1"..., 
    len=1178, rcv_info=0xbfc1a2d0) at receive.c:175
#22 0x080b60bf in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:449
#23 0x0806c38c in main (argc=15, argv=0xbfc1a454) at main.c:774

does it tell to you, i.e., does it make sense to make this exercise in
production system where the problem occurs?

-- juha



More information about the Users mailing list