[Kamailio-Users] we don't follow the RFCs!

BERGANZ François francois at acropolistelecom.net
Fri Nov 27 10:25:40 CET 2009


But in the RFC 3261 §21.1.1 it is 100 Trying
"Giving a try" doesn't exist, as I can see



François BERGANZ
 Pensez à l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si nécessaire.


-----Message d'origine-----
De : users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org] De la part de Olle E. Johansson
Envoyé : vendredi 27 novembre 2009 10:11
À : Klaus Darilion
Cc : users at lists.kamailio.org
Objet : Re: [Kamailio-Users] we don't follow the RFCs!


27 nov 2009 kl. 09.43 skrev Klaus Darilion:

> 
> 
> Olle E. Johansson schrieb:
>> 26 nov 2009 kl. 22.18 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
>>> El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, BERGANZ François escribió:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> As I could see in the source, we don’t follow the RFCs.
>>>> 
>>>> If I send an INVITE, kamailio response a “Giving a try”
>>>> 
>>>> It isn’t in the RFCs! It is normaly “Trying”.
>>>> 
>>> That's just a response description, no more. RFC 3261 doesn't state that the 100 response reason must be "Trying", it could be any text (i.e. "your money is important for us").
>> Which also means that any SIP implementation that tries to parse the text is broken.
>> Only the number is significant.
> 
> Yes. Parsing for internal use is broken. But displaying it to the user might be useful in case of error responses.

Absolutely. Phones that display "603" as a message to a phone user is considered broken (by me, myself and I).

/O :-)
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users at lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list