[Kamailio-Users] 487 Request Terminated and BYE
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Mar 17 21:58:08 CET 2009
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Martes, 17 de Marzo de 2009, Alex Balashov escribió:
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>> Not so easy. I've never tryed the only way to process a *stateless* reply
>>> is in "onreply_route[0]".
>>> Theorically "check_trans()" works also in ONREPLY_ROUTE, but even if it
>>> detects the reply, how to drop it? do "drop()" or "exit()" eliminate a
>>> response?
>> I would think drop() would do it.
>>
>> Why is the response stateless? When a 487 is relayed by a proxy it is
>> statefully associated with an INVITE transaction that is being closed in
>> response to a CANCEL, right? Or did I not carefully read this thread
>> and miss something?
>
> The transaction was terminated when a branch replied a 200 (as RFC 3261
> states).
Ahh. So, then why does the "reason" code for 487 say something like
"transaction terminated," if the transaction has not existed for a long
time?
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775
More information about the Users
mailing list