[Kamailio-Users] TCP supervisor process in Kamailio

[Jiri Kuthan]

Pascal Maugeri wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion Jiri. So far I have been monitoring sr and I 
> know that the TCP async implementation might resolve some problems we're 
> facing with kamailio.
> 
> But I'm a bit conservative and I want to do several verifications of sr 
> before doing the "switch". So for now we stick to kamailio.
> 
> Does this TCP supervisor process priority sounds familiar to you for 
> tuning kamailio ?

not really -- I sort of think that studying tuning of something what is 
overdue
for an update may cost you lot of time and bring less results.

-jiri


> 
> Regards,
> Pascal
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org 
> <mailto:jiri at iptel.org>> wrote:
> 
>     if you are concerned about TCP performance (Which may be a justified
>     concern -- from any possible viewpoint TCP is not easy for SIP),
>     I suggest you consider the sip-router core. There has been (and I think
>     still will be) tremendous effort put in it.
> 
>     -jiri
> 
>     Pascal Maugeri wrote:
> 
>         Hi
> 
>         I recently read the following in order to optimize OpenSER in
>         handling
>         TCP connections:
> 
>         "First, the TCP supervisor process must be given an elevated
>         priority
>         level in order to prevent anomalous behavior due to the Linux
>         scheduler."
> 
>         First of all, as this is quite old paper (it refers to OpenSER 1.2),
>         I'm wondering if such a tuning is still needed for Kamailio 1.5
>         branch
>         ? If yes, how can I do this ?
> 
>         Regards,
>         Pascal
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>         Users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:Users at lists.kamailio.org>
>         http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>         http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
>