[Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy() vis-a-vis BYE

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2009/7/8 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
>> Yes, but what I mean is that in the above escenario PATH is required
>> in order client to receive calls from Registrar (forget NAT now).
>
> of course, the registrar always needs to support PATH. But the
> NAT-traversal mechanism only needs to support NAT if it is not running
> on the OBP, but behind the OBP.

ok :)


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>