[Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy() vis-a-vis BYE

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2009/7/7 Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt at 1und1.de>:
> if i remember correctly one of the original ideas behind the nat-traversal
> module was to consolidate the helper functionality needed to support nat
> traversal into one module, instead of having two more or less redundant
> implementations in nathelper and mediaproxy modules. Not sure how the
> current state of integration is at the moment.. I also think that a clear
> separation of efforts would be a good thing.
>
> If i understand the module docs correctly then nat_traversal seems to
> support better and/ or more efficient nat keep alive, among others. Its not
> restricted to only ping users from location table, for example.

I use nat-traversal module and it's MUCH MUCH more powerful than
nathelper, for sure.
It allows NAT keepalive for non registered users when they are in a
INVITE or SUBSCRIBE dialog.

Alex, please, take a look to nat-traversal full documentation.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>