[Kamailio-Users] stun/outbound draft...

[Victor Pascual Ávila]

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net> wrote:
> 2009/1/9 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>
>> The question could be the other way around: does anyone remember another
>> technology that needed so many patches and workarounds :-)? Just
>> thinking about the number of RFCs and drafts coming to
>> complete/recommend/give usage guidelines ...
>
> I can imagine IETF people writting RFC 3261 in their IPv6 LAN networks:
>
> - IETF man in black 1:  "humm, should I consider NAT in this
>                         specification?..."
>
> - IETF man in black 2:  "mmmmmm, but what is NAT?"
>
> - IETF man in black 1:  "AFAIK NAT is what the real world outside uses
>                         in their homes and offices, I think not all
>                         the world uses IPv6 yet... not sure..."
>
> - IETF man in black 2:  "but... if we solve NAT issue in this document...
>                         what could be writte in the future? I need to
>                         write more and more drafts and RFC, it's an
>                         obsession!"
>
> - IETF man in black 1:  "Ok, you ar right, let's ignore NAT. Hopefully
>                         noobdy will implement this specification..."
>
> - IETF man in black 2:  "Cheers"
>

Too acid to my taste
-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila