[Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0 - the time before freezing

[Alex Balashov]

Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> What I don't understand is the reasons to make current SR working with
> K and S features/modules compatibility. We don't need a SR working
> solution right now (since Kamailio and SER do exist), do we?. Wouldn't
> be better to spent devel time in porting the required K/S modules to
> SR instead of making them working as K/S modules in any way?

I think the idea is that SR is a common layer - sort of like a kernel - 
from which subsequent features are derived in both K and S.

What this fails to explain in any way is what the intended applications 
of K vs. SR are from an end-user perspective.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web     : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel     : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct  : (+1) (678) 954-0671