[Kamailio-Users] [Fwd: Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER R-URI with port parameter]
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Oct 28 22:48:11 CET 2008
Does Kamailio match 'uri == myself' if the domain is the same as the
canonical hostnames/aliases but the port is different than the one
Kamailio knows itself to be listening on?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER R-URI with port parameter
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:04 -0500
From: Dale.Worley at comcast.net
To: sip-implementors at lists.cs.columbia.edu
References:
<00D42150952F70458C66072322F7FE2502EDA940 at saturn2.aculab.com>
<200810241652.m9OGqx6s027493 at dragon.ariadne.com>
<200810241902.43581.ibc at aliax.net>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc at aliax.net>
El Viernes, 24 de Octubre de 2008, Dale.Worley at comcast.net escribió:
> sip:xxx at host:5060
> sip:xxx at host:15060
> sip:xxx at host:25060
> sip:xxx at host:35060
>
> In that case, the request-URI of the REGISTER needs to contain the
> proper port number.
Well, not totally needed. A UA could construct a REGISTER like this:
REGISTER sip:xxx at host SIP/2.0
and sent it to host:15060.
You can't depend on that working -- It's never been settled what must
happen if a SIP message arrives at a UAS which isn't the UAS that the
RFC 3263 rules would send it to. It's possible that the UAS will
forward it based on the request-URI.
It's safer to include the port, if the destination port is not 5060.
For example Twinkle does it if you set the registrar in a port
different than 5060.
I wouldn't depend on that working.
Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors at lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
More information about the Users
mailing list