[Kamailio-Users] In-dialog request correlation without loose routing?

[Klaus Darilion]

Alex Balashov schrieb:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> I guess as long as all the clients are loose_routers (final target in 
>> the RURI) it will work even without loose_route, if you only have 1 
>> proxy between the clients.
>>
>> Of course the forwarded in-dialgo requests will still have an Route 
>> header which is actually not RFC conform but ignored by allmost all 
>> SIP clients.
> 
> So, you're saying it's better to run loose_route() to have it consume 
> this extraneous Route: header?

Better? hard to say

But at least more elegant and standard conform

klaus