[Kamailio-Users] Remote-Party-ID header

[Jerome Martin]

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 14:45 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, ALAEDDINE abbech escribió:
> > thanks,
> > I readed the RFC 3325 before sending my mail, but now my problem is to
> > implement this RFC with the use of NDI and the NDS. Who know how put the
> > NDI and the NDS in the header P-Asserted-Identity and P-Preferred-Identity?
> 
> Ok, what is NDI and NDS?


In some countries, France included, you do not have just an ANI
associated with a POTS line.
You have one "head of installation" number, that is specific to the
global setup of a telco customer, and then specific ANIs for each
endpoints.
This is a problem in several protocols, because usually only one field
exists.

Also, in SS7 peering with PTTs in some europpean countries, you need
both numbers because only one of them is authoritative for identifying
the line (then "installation ANI"), as the other one can be
user-specified.

Think of it as a billing identity and a caller-id. 

Jérôme Martin | LongPhone
Responsable Architecture Réseau
122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris 
Tel :  +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44
Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45
Mail : jmartin at longphone.fr
Web : www.longphone.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081103/eec4ea00/attachment.htm