[OpenSER-Users] "noisy_ctimer" parameter in TM module
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at in.ilimit.es
Tue Mar 4 11:27:09 CET 2008
El Tuesday 04 March 2008 11:20:47 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks a lot for the valuable input. In my opinion,trying to summarize
> the discussion:
>
> what we need is not to have a mechanism to ignore the C timer, but
> rather a better way to manage/control C timer.
>
> This means:
>
> 1) dropping (after all) the "noisy_ctimer" as it proves to be more or
> less a hack
>
> 2) add new feature to manage/control C timer (like onreply route change
> support, different routes for timeout and failures, etc)..
>
>
> Is this commonly agreed?
I agree.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at in.ilimit.es
More information about the Users
mailing list