[OpenSER-Users] Radius accounting and Dialog

[David Villasmil]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at in.ilimit.es>
wrote:

> El Monday 16 June 2008 13:45:07 escribió:
>
> Jola, ¿tal vez iba para la lista? XDDDDD
>
>
> > > If you manage clients behind NAT with no STUN you need to fix NAT in
> SIP
> > > signalling. For that you need managing rport, rewritting "Contact"
> header
> > > and so.
> > > Of course, if you are not the responsible of the clients you don't need
> > > it. :)
> >
> > As i'm not responsible for the clients I always do:
> >
> >             setbflag(7);
> >             force_rport();
> >             fix_contact();
> >
> >         append_hf("P-hint: Route[6]: mediaproxy \r\n");
> >         use_media_proxy();
> >
> >
> > on an INVITE, as I don't care whether they are behind NAT or not. And
> > on the REPLYs:
> >
> >         append_hf("P-hint: Onreply-route - fixcontact \r\n");
> >         fix_contact();
> >
> >         if (search("^Content-Type:[ ]*application/sdp")) {
> >             append_hf("P-hint: onreply_route|usemediaproxy \r\n");
> >             use_media_proxy();
> >         };
>

> You only have to "fix_contact" if the reply is a 180|183 or 2XX
> Be careful, if you get a REDIRECT (3XX) whose information is in it
> "CONTACT" (who to redirect to), you'll delete the "contact"
>
>
>
> > this way if the are behind NAT or not, i'll always fix the contacts
> > and force mediaproxy....
> >
> > do you think this is correct?
>
> Have you had problems with calls getting cut off? BYE/CANCEL/ACK that
> didn't reach its destination?
> If you haven't, the it is correct ;)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080616/ee1384f6/attachment.htm