[OpenSER-Users] stun

[Ali Jawad]

Hi All

I had a lot of problems with STUN and symmetric NAT. The thing is that
it does not always work with symmetric NAT. That would be mostly routers
based on Linux IPTABLES.

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei
Iancu
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:42 AM
To: pezhman_lali at yahoo.com
Cc: users at lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] stun

Hi Pezhman,

If I'm not wrong STUN cannot cross symmetric nats - it is one of its 
limitations.

Regards,
Bogdan

Pezhman Lali wrote:
>
> --- On Mon, 6/9/08, Pezhman Lali <pezhman_lali at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> From: Pezhman Lali <pezhman_lali at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: stun
>> To: pezhman.lali at gmail.com
>> Date: Monday, June 9, 2008, 6:02 PM
>> Dear,
>> does setting the ip of  stun server in the sip-phones,
>> behind the symmetric nat, make the problem ?
>> my experience with stund 0.96, said yes.
>> the stun server, can detects the type of nats properly, but
>> the sip-phones behind the un-symmetric nat, can not
>> register, or one-way calling.
>>
>> ????
>>     
>
>
>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.