[OpenSER-Users] loose_route() and t_relay(proto:host:port, [flags])

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

El Lunes, 9 de Junio de 2008, Anatoly Pidruchny escribió:
> Daniel,
>
> thank you, that works! But then, currently it does not make any sense to
> call t_relay() with a parameter when $du is set, because the parameter
> is going to be ignored. The priority of either $du or the parameter of
> t_relay() is not really clear from the documentation. But, IMHO, the
> parameter of t_relay function has to have greater priority then $du. Any
> comments? Should I open a bug report for this?

I agree with you. It makes sense that a explicit destination set 
as "t_relay()" parameter should be the final destination instead of Route 
headers.

Please, report a bug about it :)

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo