[Kamailio-Users] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Kamailio-Devel] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Kamailio 1.4.2 : Weird Retransmission

Aurelien Grimaud gstelzz at yahoo.fr
Tue Dec 9 20:11:58 CET 2008


Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>
>
> Aurelien Grimaud wrote:
>> I am able to reproduce it with 1 call / second without my module on 
>> BYE requests.
>> here are traces.
>>
>> ps: I added the ms on Logs.
>
> How? Are you using syslog-ng?
slight modification of dprint.h
>
> klaus
>
>
>>
>> Aurelien
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
>>> On 12/09/08 17:56, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
>>>>     
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/09/08 17:31, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Fair enough.
>>>>>>> If no one already experienced this strange behavior, it should 
>>>>>>> be my module ...
>>>>>>> I'll try to make it again without my module.
>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>> See my other email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> However, in the log, after the 200 response, there is a 
>>>>>>> cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset.
>>>>>>> So those timers are cleared.
>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>> But the problem is, that the process which handles the INVITE has 
>>>>>> not finished yet and those (re)SETS the timer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Daniel - Have you investigated the problem?
>>>>>>                 
>>>>> so this is the half of the issue reported via:
>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2105813&group_id=139143&atid=743020 
>>>>>           
>>>> yes.
>>>>
>>>> Can it be related to other modules which register callbacks (e.g. 
>>>> pua module or Aurelien's module?
>>>>       
>>> what is the requests/second rate when the issue appears?
>>>
>>> At first look, between sending and setting retransmission timer, 
>>> there is no much processing for the request. The callback executed 
>>> there is in use by siptrace, are you using this module?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>  
>>>>     
>>>>> This one got lost, but as I started to fix the other half 
>>>>> (replying using proper mode to do retransmission), will 
>>>>> investigate this as well ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>> klaus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> To investigate any further, could you point me where in the 
>>>>>>> source the retransmission timers are cleared ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aurelien
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>>>>>>                    
>>>>>>>> Is it also happening WITHOUT your module?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> klaus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>>>>                          
>>>>>>>>> As a matter of fact, I already checked this.
>>>>>>>>> There is a reply route set before t_relay, and log outputs in it.
>>>>>>>>> The log line is well seen on 180 and on 200.
>>>>>>>>> This does not avoid retransmission.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is a log file with much trace for a call that was 
>>>>>>>>> answered but retransmitted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on an INVITE, a module of mine is collecting all contacts for 
>>>>>>>>> a serial forking.
>>>>>>>>> an on_reply_route is set, with a trace of mine in it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My log format is :
>>>>>>>>> T000 [date] [time] bin#ser#<pid>#-1 = <log>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This was on a 1 call only.
>>>>>>>>> I cannot figure out what is happening.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any comment  is welcome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>>> Aurelien
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>                                
>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Not the ACK, but the 200 Ok will stop retransmission. I 
>>>>>>>>>> suspect that the 200 ok is not identified as belonging to the 
>>>>>>>>>> INVITE transaction.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. before t_relay() activate a certain reply_route 
>>>>>>>>>> (t_on_reply("3"))
>>>>>>>>>> 2. put some xlog in the the default reply route
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> onreply_route {
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("default reply route ...\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3. put some xlog in the reply route you activated with 
>>>>>>>>>> t_on_reply()
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> onreply_route[3] {
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("reply route 3 ...\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4. watch the log output
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If both reply routes are exectued then kamailio successfully 
>>>>>>>>>> matched the reply to the response. If only the default reply 
>>>>>>>>>> route is executed then the transaction matching failed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try only with a single call (not 1000 calls/s) first.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>>>>> klaus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>                                      
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, I am using kamailio 1.4.2 and testing it with sipp.
>>>>>>>>>>> one sipp is client a uac (port 5066), the other is a uas 
>>>>>>>>>>> (port 5063).
>>>>>>>>>>> kamailio is using 5060.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am generating 100 calls per second for 1000 calls and 
>>>>>>>>>>> message were retransmitted 4 times.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a tcpdump of sip packets.
>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me why there is an INVITE retransmission at 
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 though the ACK for invite was received at 
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a known problem with retransmission timers ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.120384 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 579
>>>>>>>>>>> E.._.. at .@.f....!...!.....K..INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123426 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 325
>>>>>>>>>>> E..a.. at .@.g....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1;received=192.168.168.33 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Server: Kamailio (1.4.2-notls (i386/linux))
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123554 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.123830 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 451
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.gz...!...!.......pSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124169 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 393
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......6SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124326 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 634
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.f....!...!.......'SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   153
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.124883 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 581
>>>>>>>>>>> E..a.. at .@.f....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:192.168.168.33:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   153
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.125532 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 427
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......XACK sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 521
>>>>>>>>>>> E..%.. at .@.g,...!...!........ACK sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627677 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 474
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:38.627970 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 416
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.642356 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.642587 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 474
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.643723 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 416
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.797641 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 434
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!......._BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798436 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: 
>>>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798535 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:39.798814 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, length: 336
>>>>>>>>>>> E..l.. at .@.g....!...!.....X..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:40.257973 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: 
>>>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:40.258080 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.285493 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: 
>>>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.285593 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 394
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:41.695686 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, length: 731
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:43.338592 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: 
>>>>>>>>>>> SIP, length: 528
>>>>>>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 16:16:43.338785 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, length: 408
>>>>>>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......ESIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063;transport=UDP>
>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>>                                               
>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>>> Devel at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>> Devel at lists.kamailio.org
>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>
>>>   
>






More information about the Users mailing list