[Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Kamailio 1.4.2 : Weird Retransmission

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Tue Dec 9 16:52:09 CET 2008


Hello,

On 12/09/08 17:31, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>   
>> Fair enough.
>> If no one already experienced this strange behavior, it should be my 
>> module ...
>> I'll try to make it again without my module.
>>     
>
> See my other email.
>
>   
>> However, in the log, after the 200 response, there is a 
>> cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset.
>> So those timers are cleared.
>>     
>
> But the problem is, that the process which handles the INVITE has not 
> finished yet and those (re)SETS the timer.
>
> @Daniel - Have you investigated the problem?
>   
so this is the half of the issue reported via:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2105813&group_id=139143&atid=743020

This one got lost, but as I started to fix the other half (replying 
using proper mode to do retransmission), will investigate this as well ...

Cheers,
Daniel

> regards
> klaus
>
>   
>> To investigate any further, could you point me where in the source the 
>> retransmission timers are cleared ?
>>
>> Aurelien
>>
>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>     
>>> Is it also happening WITHOUT your module?
>>>
>>> klaus
>>>
>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>       
>>>> As a matter of fact, I already checked this.
>>>> There is a reply route set before t_relay, and log outputs in it.
>>>> The log line is well seen on 180 and on 200.
>>>> This does not avoid retransmission.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a log file with much trace for a call that was answered but 
>>>> retransmitted.
>>>>
>>>> on an INVITE, a module of mine is collecting all contacts for a 
>>>> serial forking.
>>>> an on_reply_route is set, with a trace of mine in it
>>>>
>>>> My log format is :
>>>> T000 [date] [time] bin#ser#<pid>#-1 = <log>
>>>>
>>>> This was on a 1 call only.
>>>> I cannot figure out what is happening.
>>>>
>>>> Any comment  is welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>> Aurelien
>>>>
>>>> Klaus Darilion a écrit :
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Not the ACK, but the 200 Ok will stop retransmission. I suspect 
>>>>> that the 200 ok is not identified as belonging to the INVITE 
>>>>> transaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. before t_relay() activate a certain reply_route (t_on_reply("3"))
>>>>> 2. put some xlog in the the default reply route
>>>>>
>>>>> onreply_route {
>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>     xlog("default reply route ...\n");
>>>>>     xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>     xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. put some xlog in the reply route you activated with t_on_reply()
>>>>>
>>>>> onreply_route[3] {
>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>>     xlog("reply route 3 ...\n");
>>>>>     xlog("response: $$rm = $rm\n");
>>>>>     xlog("response: $mb\n");
>>>>>     xlog("===========================");
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. watch the log output
>>>>>
>>>>> If both reply routes are exectued then kamailio successfully matched 
>>>>> the reply to the response. If only the default reply route is 
>>>>> executed then the transaction matching failed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try only with a single call (not 1000 calls/s) first.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>> klaus
>>>>>
>>>>> Aurelien Grimaud schrieb:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi, I am using kamailio 1.4.2 and testing it with sipp.
>>>>>> one sipp is client a uac (port 5066), the other is a uas (port 5063).
>>>>>> kamailio is using 5060.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am generating 100 calls per second for 1000 calls and message 
>>>>>> were retransmitted 4 times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is a tcpdump of sip packets.
>>>>>> Can anyone tell me why there is an INVITE retransmission at 
>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 though the ACK for invite was received at 
>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 ?
>>>>>> Is there a known problem with retransmission timers ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.120384 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 579
>>>>>> E.._.. at .@.f....!...!.....K..INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.123426 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 325
>>>>>> E..a.. at .@.g....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1;received=192.168.168.33
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Server: Kamailio (1.4.2-notls (i386/linux))
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.123554 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 731
>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.123830 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 451
>>>>>> E..... at .@.gz...!...!.......pSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.124169 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 393
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......6SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.124326 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 634
>>>>>> E..... at .@.f....!...!.......'SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   153
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.124883 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 581
>>>>>> E..a.. at .@.f....!...!.....M..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:192.168.168.33:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   153
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 6004 RTP/AVP 0 8
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.125532 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 427
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......XACK sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.126096 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 521
>>>>>> E..%.. at .@.g,...!...!........ACK sip:192.168.168.33:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.627198 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 731
>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.627677 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 474
>>>>>> E..... at .@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:38.627970 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 416
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.642356 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 731
>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.642587 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 474
>>>>>> E..... at .@.gc...!...!........SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.2, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.643723 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 416
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......MSIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-11
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.797641 IP 192.168.168.33.5066 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 434
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!......._BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5066;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.798436 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 528
>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.798535 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 394
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:39.798814 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5066: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 336
>>>>>> E..l.. at .@.g....!...!.....X..SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:40.257973 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 528
>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:40.258080 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 394
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:41.285493 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 528
>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:41.285593 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 394
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......7SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:41.695686 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 192.168.168.33.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 731
>>>>>> E..... at .@.fZ...!...!........INVITE sip:otest at testg5 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bKcb7d.7c08af34.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-1
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:otest at testg5>
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Expires: 180
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>>>>>> Content-Length:   188
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v=0
>>>>>> o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> s=-
>>>>>> c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1
>>>>>> t=0 0
>>>>>> m=audio 8925 RTP/AVP 8 101
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:43.338592 IP 192.168.168.33.5060 > 127.0.0.1.5063: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 528
>>>>>> E..,.. at .@.P....!............BYE sip:127.0.0.1:5063 SIP/2.0
>>>>>> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.168.33;lr=on;ftag=23096SIPpTag09730>
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: sip:sipp at 127.0.0.1:5066
>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69
>>>>>> Subject: Performance Test
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 16:16:43.338785 IP 192.168.168.33.5063 > 192.168.168.33.5060: SIP, 
>>>>>> length: 408
>>>>>> E..... at .@.g....!...!.......ESIP/2.0 200 OK
>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK9b7d.0423bf25.0, 
>>>>>> SIP/2.0/UDP 
>>>>>> 127.0.0.1:5066;received=192.168.168.33;branch=z9hG4bK-23096-730-46
>>>>>> From: sipp 
>>>>>> <sip:730-23096-127.0.0.1 at 127.0.0.1:5066>;tag=23096SIPpTag09730
>>>>>> To: sut <sip:service at 192.168.168.33:5060>;tag=17278SIPpTag01696
>>>>>> Call-ID: 730-23096-127.0.0.1
>>>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE
>>>>>> Contact: <sip:127.0.0.1:5063;transport=UDP>
>>>>>> Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>             
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com





More information about the Users mailing list