[Kamailio-Users] fr_inv_timer increased to 120 secs
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at in.ilimit.es
Tue Aug 12 10:37:46 CEST 2008
El Tuesday 12 August 2008 08:55:49 Klaus Darilion escribió:
> > Anyway other problem will occur with the following ACK. If 2XX the ACK is
> > a new transaction but AFAIK OpenSer matches it (in some way) to the
> > INVITE transaction (now expired). If non 2XX then the ACK is part of the
> > INVITE transaction so it will not delivered to the UAS because the
> > transaction expired.
>
> Indeed, ACK routing will be more difficult. 200-OK ACK should be loose
> routed - thus no problem.
Well, "no problem"? I thing it must be handled doing something as:
if method == "ACK" {
if ! t_checktran <-- Because transaction is deleted now
lookup("location")
...
> non-200 ACK I guess will be absorbed by tm
> (not sure about this).
How can occur tha tif transaction has been already deleted?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at in.ilimit.es
More information about the Users
mailing list