[OpenSER-Users] About efficiency in conditionals
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Oct 16 15:18:58 CEST 2007
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I'm wondering which solution (A or B) is more efficient in case method is
> NOT an INVITE:
>
>
> A) if ( (method=="INVITE") && (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) )
>
> B) if ( mehtod=="INVITE" )
>
AFAIK the conditions are checked in the order they appear and stop as
soon as possible. In your case in != INVITE it should be the same.
Further, if you use is_method("INVITE") it is even faster.
regards
klaus
>
> My question is: Is faster B because does less comparasions?
> or does OpenSer break A conditional during first condition (method=="INVITE")
> because it's false so then A and B are equally efficient?
>
>
> And which is more efficient (C or D) when all the conditions are true?
>
> C) if ( (method=="INVITE") && (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) ) {
> ....
>
> D) if ( method=="INVITE" ) {
> if ( (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) ) {
> ...
>
>
> Thanks for any explanation.
> Best regards.
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list