[OpenSER-Users] [Fwd: Re: [OpenSER-Devel] pua module - unsubscribe]
Anca Vamanu
anca at voice-system.ro
Tue Nov 13 11:30:31 CET 2007
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Devel] pua module - unsubscribe
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:57:03 +0200
From: Anca Vamanu <anca at voice-system.ro>
To: Reinhold Buchinger <reinhold.buchinger at gmail.com>
References: <473420DF.8020809 at gmail.com>
<47342410.4080307 at voice-system.ro> <47348B90.8070700 at gmail.com>
<47381EEA.6090702 at voice-system.ro> <4738CC58.6040105 at gmail.com>
Hello,
The succession on checks was wrong. Please test with the latest revision.
Thanks and regards,
Anca
Reinhold Buchinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, there is also an unwanted side-effect. If a
> subscription is renewed expires is set to -1 for the call-back
> parameter (infinite subscribes). In case of an error this also
> triggers a new subscription with expires = 0....
>
> regards,
> Reinhold
>
> Anca Vamanu schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It is not about retransmission there, but about the cases in which a
>> request is sent inside a dialog stored by pua but which is not
>> recognized by the client (the case of a client signing off and no
>> Subscribe with expires= 0 sent to pua to announce it that the dialog
>> has ended). The logics are like this: if someone asked me to send a
>> request (for publish it's the same) and I matched it with a stored
>> dialog and it failed, try again with an initial request. This is to
>> ensure a a certain reliability.
>> Therefore, in that case that you mentioned, when a second attempt is
>> made, it is no longer about an unsubscribe. The request sent will be
>> an fetching Subscribe(one with expires= 0)- I have made the changes
>> to make this case possible. However,even if an unsubscribe was
>> desired, the effects are the same, the dialog is already no longer
>> valid, the pua record is deleted, and a Notify is sent.
>>
>> regards,
>> Anca Vamanu
>>
>> Reinhold Buchinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answer. But there is still a problem with
>>> subs_cback_func(...) if a retransmission is triggered. This message
>>> cannot be send with expires=0.
>>>
>>> subs.expires= (hentity->desired_expires>0)?
>>> hentity->desired_expires- (int)time(NULL)+ 10:-1;
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Reinhold
>>>
>>>
>>> Anca Vamanu schrieb:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> The expires= 0 case is covered in subs_build_hdr(...) :
>>>>
>>>> if( expires<= min_expires)
>>>> subs_expires= int2str(min_expires, &len); else
>>>> subs_expires= int2str(expires+ 10, &len);
>>>>
>>>> if the module parameter min_expires maintains its default value,
>>>> which is 0.
>>>> I will test to see if indeed it is not possible now to unsubscribe.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Anca Vamanu
>>>>
>>>> Reinhold Buchinger wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Using the pua module, I cannot send a subscription with expires=0.
>>>>> If you look at subs_build_hdr(...) in send_subscribe.c this case
>>>>> is not covered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Reinhold
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>> Devel at lists.openser.org
>>>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list