[Users] Some precisions about reply_route handling

Wed Feb 28 14:49:56 CET 2007

Hello list,

 My openser (1.1.0) does not forward provisionnal replies.  Currently, the "180 Ringing" I receive are absorbed, and that is bad.

But I don't use any configuration directive to explicitely and statefully forward provisionnal answers. Please, which can I use? The reply_route block that is used is set with a call to t_on_reply .

Thanks a lot.

 JF Smigielski.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20070228/927e8e22/attachment.htm 