[OpenSER-Users] RE: NAT question

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

El Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:40:32 Papadopoulos Georgios escribió:
> Hi Inaki,
>
> Why would you leave out the "4" flag test in nat_uac_test() for the
> replies?

Yes, sorry, 4 is valid.

> Of course if I leave out the "2" test then my example works (I 
> have tested it) but I am afraid that this will break some other NATed
> senario. And if leave out the "2" test, should I also leave out the "16"
> test?

In my notes I have:

" 16) Is received port (source port of the packet) different from the port 
specified in the top-most Via header? (this can be used to detect some broken 
STUN implementations)"

Maybe test 16 is just for these broken STUN cases?


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc at in.ilimit.es