[Users] Re: [Devel] Re: null radius_extra avp for acc is causing openser to crash

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ovidiu,

I will do the backport to 1.2 and 1.1.

For the integer radius AVP - I do not say it is not possible or 
difficult, but I need some time to take a look and make an evaluation. 
In the mean while, pleas upload it as feature request.

Thanks and regards,
Bogdan

Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> The crash doesn't occur anymore and the system behave as expected.
> You can backport the fix to 1.2.
>
> I know that we discussed the integer vs. string issue in a separate 
> thread.
> Would it be difficult to fix this issue for radius?
> If the avp is an integer and the radius attribute is also an integer
> one, can we keep the type and push the value with the proper type into
> the RADIUS request?
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On 4/18/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>> Hi Ovidiu,
>>
>> Thanks for the trace. I took a look through the radiusng lib and the
>> problem seams to be the RADIUS AVP type issue - that was discussed in a
>> separate thread - that all extra info is internally generated as 
>> strings.
>>
>> The acc_extra value does not exists, so the (0,0) string is used, but
>> when the RADIUS AVP is added, as the type is INTEGER, radius string will
>> try to convert it to write it as integer and it will crash.
>>
>> So, if you change in the radius dict the type of attribute to string, it
>> should net crash any more.
>>
>> On the other hand, openser should be fixed also to be safe in such
>> cases. The solution will be not to added the RADIUS AVP for the empty
>> extra_acc values. I will made a fix on trunk - if you could test it, it
>> will be great.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> > Hi Bogdan,
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's the backtrace:
>> > (gdb) bt
>> > #0  0x00190e98 in rc_avpair_assign (vp=0x946e7e8, pval=0x0, len=0) at
>> > avpair.c:77
>> > #1  0x00190fa2 in rc_avpair_new (rh=0x9469eb8, attrid=32, pval=0x0,
>> > len=0, vendorpec=155641832) at avpair.c:118
>> > #2  0x001914dc in rc_avpair_add (rh=0x9469eb8, list=0xbfde7934,
>> > attrid=32, pval=0x0, len=0, vendorpec=0) at avpair.c:36
>> > #3  0x00fbecd0 in acc_rad_request (req=0xb6174490) at acc.c:540
>> > #4  0x00fc1195 in tmcb_func (t=0xb6173658, type=128, ps=0x1678f4) at
>> > acc_logic.c:373
>> > #5  0x00146130 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128, trans=0xb6173658,
>> > req=0xb6174490, rpl=0x81539d8, code=200) at t_hooks.c:205
>> > #6  0x001588a3 in relay_reply (t=0xb6173658, p_msg=0x81539d8,
>> > branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0xbfde7b30) at t_reply.c:1140
>> > #7  0x00159414 in reply_received (p_msg=0x81539d8) at t_reply.c:1373
>> > #8  0x0805d3b6 in forward_reply (msg=0x81539d8) at forward.c:488
>> > #9  0x0807b348 in receive_msg (
>> >    buf=0x811ac40 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> > 10.11.10.148;branch=z9hG4bK5448.283b30a3.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
>> > 10.11.128.65;branch=z9hG4bKdee07386f1ffa07d\r\nFrom: \"Ovidiu Sas\"
>> > <sip:4165863565 at 10.11.10.148>;tag=6dfe150ab60fa5"..., len=962,
>> > rcv_info=0xbfde7c50) at receive.c:195
>> > #10 0x080a4393 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:465
>> > #11 0x08069f66 in main_loop () at main.c:834
>> > #12 0x0806be57 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfde7e34) at main.c:1399
>> >
>> >
>> > # openser -V
>> > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (i386/linux)
>> > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
>> > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
>> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>> > poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>> > svnrevision: 2:1987M
>> > @(#) $Id: main.c 1746 2007-03-05 16:06:58Z miconda $
>> > main.c compiled on 09:29:33 Apr 11 2007 with gcc 3.4.4
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Ovidiu Sas
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/13/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Bogdan,
>> >>
>> >> I will get you one on Monday.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ovidiu Sas
>> >>
>> >> On 4/13/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Ovidiu,
>> >> >
>> >> > there is such a check when the PV for extra acc are computed - see
>> >> > modules/acc/acc_extra.c , function extra2strar().
>> >> >
>> >> > could you provide a BT?
>> >> >
>> >> > regards,
>> >> > bogdan
>> >> >
>> >> > Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> >> > > Does anyone else experienced this?
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > > Ovidiu Sas
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 4/11/07, Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> Hi all,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> If an avp that is defined as an extra attribute for radius
>> >> accounting
>> >> > >> is null or not defined, it is causing openser to crash.  The 
>> code
>> >> > >> should check if the avp or PV is null and drop or send the
>> >> attribute
>> >> > >> based on value.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Regards,
>> >> > >> Ovidiu Sas
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > Devel mailing list
>> >> > > Devel at openser.org
>> >> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>