[Users] check_route_param and rr_preset

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

hmmm...

maybe the route hdr is not considered local...Could you sent me the 
entire sip message (privately is necessary)?

regards,
bogdan

Helge Waastad wrote:

>Hi
>
>I did some debugs, and it seems that the check_route_param is exiting in
>this check beneath. Thats why I do not get any debug messages from
>openser.....
>
>/* check if params are present */
>        if ( !routed_params.s || !routed_params.len )
>                return -1;
>
>
>hw
>
>
>
>tor, 28,.09.2006 kl. 13.06 +0300, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
>  
>
>>Helge,
>>
>>what openser version are you using?
>>
>>try to run in debug and look for:
>>    DEBUG:rr:check_route_param: params are <.......>
>>
>>
>>regards,
>>bogdan
>>
>>Helge Waastad wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I'm checking for a Re-Invite (Hold)
>>>
>>>The Invite from the UA is like this:
>>>
>>>SIP MESSAGE 1        10.46.11.132:5060() -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060()
>>>UDP Frame 1        28/Sep/06 10:45:38.0422
>>>TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0000 TimeFromStart=0.0000
>>>INVITE sip:67512388 at 10.46.11.101:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0
>>>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.46.11.132;branch=z9hG4bKeb3ee7f3572b7f4b
>>>Route:<sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes;did=3c4.85d80b74>
>>>Route:<sip:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes>
>>>
>>>I do a check_route_param("nat=yes")
>>>
>>>Should not this work?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>from the doc it says check_route_param:
>>    
>>
>>>The function checks if the URI parameters of the local Route header
>>>(coresponding to the local server)
>>>
>>>I'm also calling the function after loose_route()
>>>
>>>br hw
>>>
>>>tor, 28,.09.2006 kl. 11.35 +0300, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Helge,
>>>>
>>>>doesn't matter how you added the RR hdr - via record_route(), 
>>>>record_route_preset() or append_hf(). When you receive a sequential 
>>>>request,  check_route_param("") will check the params of the 
>>>>corresponding Route hdr.
>>>>Maybe it is a reg exp problem or  the Route does not contain the param 
>>>>you are looking for...
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>bogdan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Helge Waastad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>I was just wondering if the check_route_param("") works on
>>>>>record_route_preset Routes?
>>>>>
>>>>>It never hits when my Route: are, f.ex like
>>>>>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:<port>;nat=yes
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this true?
>>>>>
>>>>>br hw
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>