[Users] RTPProxy non working?

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at voice-system.ro
Fri Sep 1 11:17:54 CEST 2006


Hi Federico,

if the session section has a "c" definition the global "c" will not be 
used. The global "c" is to be used only for sessions without a local "c" 
definition.

If you have them both global and inside the session section, the only 
that should be used is the one from the session - that;s the reason 
RTPproxy changes only that one; because it sees there is no session 
without "c" which mean the global "c" will not be used.

I would say the GW is buggy...

regards,
bogdan

Federico Giannici wrote:

> I solved it by myself: looked at the source code and found that the 
> "c" option force nathelper to change both "c=" lines.
>
> So the question is: why it is not active by default?
> Are there any contraindications?
>
> Bye.
>
>
> Federico Giannici wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to install rtpproxy. It usually works, but there are some 
>> cases that don't work.
>>
>> For example, when a Cisco PSTN gateway is called, RTP traffic is 
>> proxied in one direction only. I think the problem is in the handling 
>> of the reply received from the gateway: it have two "c" lines but 
>> only one is modified.
>>
>> Here it is the body of the original reply:
>>
>> v=0.
>> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 2199 2489 IN IP4 83.211.2.216.
>> s=SIP Call.
>> c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217.
>> t=0 0.
>> m=audio 18850 RTP/AVP 8 13 101.
>> c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217.
>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000.
>> a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000.
>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
>> a=fmtp:101 0-11.
>> a=direction:passive.
>>
>> And here it is the body modified by rtpproxy:
>>
>> v=0.
>> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 2199 2489 IN IP4 83.211.2.216.
>> s=SIP Call.
>> c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217.
>> t=0 0.
>> m=audio 35086 RTP/AVP 8 13 101.
>> c=IN IP4 195.120.250.49.
>> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000.
>> a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000.
>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
>> a=fmtp:101 0-11.
>> a=direction:passive.
>> a=nortpproxy:yes.
>>
>> Only the secondo "c" line contain the IP of our rtpproxy. I don't 
>> know RTP enough to understand if the problem is in rtpproxy or in the 
>> gateway.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any info.
>>
>
>





More information about the Users mailing list