[Serusers] Re: [Users] TM : retransmission timers

[Mike Williams]

All,

By the way, can anyone confirm whether or not serweb is being actively 
developed? 

Thanks,

Mike Williams



On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:34, samuel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I've tried to stay out of this thread but I think it has gone far
> beyond technical arguments and I don't think it will help neither SER
> or openSER projects. I would just ask to stop this thread before it
> get worst or stack to technical discussions (which I'm learning a lot)
> and leave personal appreciations aside.
>
> I still see advantages on each project and depending on the
> requirements, one is more suited than the other. I had the hope that
> both would merge with the best of them but I see this almost
> impossible right now...
>
> I'll try to summarize differences and I would apreciate *technical*
> corrections to it (it's almost impossible to have an update
> list....fortunately, i've tried to enumerate diferences in the dev
> versions which will soon become stable):
> *openSER:
> o1)detailled documentation, including howtos
> o2)fast reaction in the mailing list from the core developers
> o3)incorporate user comments into new features
> o4)decentralised developers
> o5)improved usrloc (loading on mem, cacheless)
> o6)gaining user acceptance->biggest testing comunity
>
> *SER
> s1)improved TCP code
> s2)improved timers
> s3)easier integration with SEMS/SERWEB
>
> I have tried to be as opbjective as possible (but everyone knows it's
> almost impossible) and it would be great to create a common place to
> share experiences with both projects as someone has proposed but I
> guess everyone is really really busy right now...
>
> Samuel.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users