[Serusers] Re: Fw: [Users] TM : retransmission timers

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu Nov 23 12:39:09 CET 2006


Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2006 at 11:43, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> 
> [...] 
>>> I've tried looking at openser core & tm commits and I haven't seen any
>>> significant changes (and this is not a flamewar attempt).
>> Aren't the pseudo variables vs. select framework significant changes? 
>> Also TLS in core vs. TLS as module?
> 
> 
> Ok. I've meant openser core vs ser 0.9.4, or if you want what openser
> core has extra compared to ser 0.10.99 (speaking of bigger features,
> probably only the statistics part and the new MI, which seems to
> correspond to ser's RPC, so I wouldn't call it an extra, but
> re-inventing the wheel).
> If we are talking the other way arround, ser core has evolved much more
>  (avps in script, select, timers, dns, blacklist a.s.o).
> That's one of the reason I'm suggesting that it would be a good ideea
>  to switch to it (and at least tm), besides performance tunning and
>  extra-testing.

I would be happy if openser would switch to Ottendorf's core. But seeing 
all the changes in Ottendorf I think it will be quite complex to use 
Ottendorf's core inside openser.

regards
klaus


-- 
Klaus Darilion
nic.at





More information about the Users mailing list