[Users] Can We Use the Stun server for NAT supporting,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
daniel at voice-system.ro
Wed Nov 15 13:00:48 CET 2006
Hello,
stun is recommended when the client properly implements it and does not
sit behind a symmetric NAT (like linux box). For these cases you need to
use server side nat traversal, look at nathelper/rtpptoxy or
mediaproxy/mediaproxy.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/13/06 16:29, raviprakash sunkara wrote:
> Hello Users,
>
> Can I use the Stun server to Support the NAT.
>
> I tried a lot , My UAC's are Not Hungupping in Behind the NAT/Router
>
> My SIP ip is 192.168.2.75 <http://192.168.2.75>
> My Public IP is xx.xx.xx.xx
>
> I didn't get any Bye request to SIP server, except the Bye all the
> other Messages are Requested to MY SIP Server
>
> in openser.cfg
> i
> I'm using X-lites for testing in that
> RTP port 12222
> NAT firewall ip is 192.168.2.1 <http://192.168.2.1>
> Sip domain is xx.xx.xx.xx
> Sip proxy xx.xx.xx.xx
> ______________________________________________
> modparam ("nathelper",rtpproxy_sock","udp: 192.168.2.75:12222
> <http://192.168.2.75:12222>"
>
> if(nat_uac_test("19"))
> {
> if(method=="REGISTER")
> {
> fix_nated_register();
> force_rport();
> setflag(6);
> } else
> {
>
> if(method=="INVITE")
> {
> fix_nated_sdp("3")
> };
> fix_nated_contact();
> };
> };
> ______________________________________________
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Ravi Prakash Sunkara
> ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com <mailto:ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com>
> M:+91 9985077535
> O:+91 40 23114549
> F:+91 40 40208727
> ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com <mailto:ravi.sunkara at hyperion-tech.com>
> www.hyperion-tech.com <http://www.hyperion-tech.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list