Fw: [Users] TM : retransmission timers

[Weiter Leiter]

Common user barely has time to meet his boss requirements, rather than
playing around with different scenarios, platforms, environments.

I only read one email where Daniel stated that OpenSER now performs a whole
much better while loading users from database. SER guys put no figure out
yet, neither bare numbers nor comparisons. I'm just really curious to see
how both servers perform, that's all.

Even though I must maintain my SER, I kinda like OpenSER's faster releases
and developers' responsiveness (that I shamelessly exploit for the common
code left there :-), which is pretty much nonexistent with iptel (at least
this is the general belief here at OpenSER). But about this I'll probably
have to fight on SER's mailing list. I still wish that one day I won't have
to compare features; heck, NetSER and FreeSER are still available ;-).

WL.

PS. Maybe regretfully, I haven't seen any iptel booth at von this year,
while OpenSER guys put up a nice show. My congrats.

On 11/9/06, Kim Il <kim_il_s at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I can see what you are hinting at, but I guess that the users are the
> unbiased party that should do the judgment and not the parties who have
> something to gain.
>
> cheers
>
> *Weiter Leiter <bp4mls at googlemail.com>* wrote:
>
> This features comparisons are not to last for too long, some performance
> comparisons would also be nice. After all, there are plenty of UA-level
> stacks out there. At least now that both projects get to have stable
> releases after forking and some core functionality remained shared.
>
> I wonder what "unbiased" organization will take up the challenge. :-)
>
> On 11/8/06, Kim Il < kim_il_s at yahoo.com > wrote:
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > this is a really good start and we should collect these things  so as to
> > help the  community to take the right choice. I would also suggest that what
> > ever ground breaking issues we list we stay at the functional level (I do
> > not think anyone is helped by using a description containing "allowing
> > carrier grade platforms" and similar marketing phrases).
> >
> > cheers
>
>
> {truncated because too large}
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Sponsored Link
>
> Talk more and pay less. Vonage can save you up to $300 a year on your
> phone bill. Sign up now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon1080000017von/direct/01/>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061109/07d8a0fb/attachment.htm