[Users] OpenSER dimensioning. How many calls/sec can it set up?

[unplug]

What do you mean a 'simple' SIP-Proxy?
Is it UA -- SIPproxy -- UA?
I have also tested openser without using NAT  (All device is in the
same network).  But the maximum number of current calls is only around
80.
For the configuration file, I use those files download from
http://www.onsip.org/.  I think they are the simple configuration that
I can trust.
Finally, just want to say the target usage of openser.  Does it target
for a small group of users instead of a global voip environment?


On 5/30/06, Edson <4lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> My two cents:
>
> OpenSER/SER can handle hundreds of concurrent calls, but as a 'simple'
> SIP-Proxy not as a media-proxy (RTP-Proxy). Your numbers would be clearer if
> You could aggregate information on the loads only from OpenSER/SER, without
> MediaProxy or RTPProxy. You would get some very impressive numbers,
> unfortunately dropped by the [Media|RTP]proxy presence.
>
> Try to review Your configuration, so that You forward to media-aware servers
> only calls that needed it (with one UA sitting behind a NAT box,p.ex.), not
> all. It would give a 'little' more headache for design and maintenance, but
> would permit a higher concurrent call number... ;)
>
> Edson.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: users-bounces at openser.org [mailto:users-bounces at openser.org] On
> > Behalf Of unplug
> > Sent: segunda-feira, 29 de maio de 2006 22:23
> > To: Juha Heinanen
> > Cc: OpenSER-users
> > Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER dimensioning. How many calls/sec can it set
> > up?
> >
> > You are right that you can have 10 servers installed mediaproxy to
> > handle 300 concurrent calls.  However, it is not a practical way to
> > implement a system to support several hundred concurrent calls using
> > several servers.  As someone said, openser can handle several hundred
> > calls, maybe thousand.  Comparing to my testing result, I have no idea
> > the capacity of openser can handle.  Anyone can tell me the real
> > capacity that openser can handle?
> >
> > On 5/29/06, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:
> > > unplug writes:
> > >
> > >  > mediaproxy spends much of the CPU to handle the call compared with
> > >  > rtpproxy.  From the result that I made in the load test, the number
> > of
> > >  > concurrent call is much much less than we expected.
> > >  > maximum concurrent call using mediaproxy (openser & mediaproxy in the
> > >  > same server): 30
> > >  > maximum concurrent call using rtpproxy (openser & rtpproxy in the
> > same
> > >  > server): 60
> > >
> > > you can distribute mediaproxy to as many host you want.  or are you
> > > saying that mediaproxy module functions use_mediaproxy/end_mediaproxy
> > > are the bottleneck?
> > >
> > > -- juha
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>