[Users] clustering

[Edson]

I use this kind of clustering, but there is a performance penalty. Not so
high, but...

Also, in the meantime, how about try a double-chained t_replicate
configuration in conjunction with DB cache? In case of a double replication,
I understand that it would only update the DB. Am I thinking in a, at least,
reasonable way?

Edson.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at openser.org [mailto:users-bounces at openser.org] On
> Behalf Of Andreas Granig
> Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de maio de 2006 17:01
> To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> Cc: users at openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] clustering
> 
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> > yes, that's right - I will take a look to see how difficult is to change
> > t_replicate() to be able to sent to more destinations in parallel.
> 
> I'd really encourage everybody evaluating a clustered solution to try
> cacheless usrloc in combination with mysql-cluster. Scales very well,
> without the side-effect of inevitable usrloc inconsistency...
> 
> Just my 2 cents,
> Andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users