[Users] db_extra in acc - is order relevant

[Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya]

aaargh.
i totally forgot about the missed_calls table.
thanx

cheers

p.s.  why does the CANCEL still get logged to acc?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> the missed_calls table must have same structure as acc table. The same 
> information is saved in both tables (similar to location and aliases 
> tables).
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 05/03/2006 05:24 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>> Hmmm.
>>
>> well, heres an interesting issue then
>> I have an additional column (src_ip) which I log using db_extra  
>> ("src_ip=$avp($srcIp);)
>> It works. Well, mostly works. If I CANCEL an INVITE, I get the 
>> following error
>>         9(9231) ACC: call missed: 
>> call_id=3c6d8d5f15f9-7a9jw7ca79xt at snom190........
>>         9(9231) submit_query: Unknown column 'src_ip' in 'field list'
>>         9(9231) db_insert: Error while submitting query
>> Inspecting acc shows that the CANCEL got logged, but the INVITE didn't.
>> However, INVITEs get logged for /all/ other transactions.
>>
>> Anything obvious?
>>
>> Come to think of it, it looks like acc logs both the INVITE and the 
>> CANCEL when the transaction is completed.  Is this correct?  Should 
>> it work this way?  Or should it log the INVITE once it passes it on, 
>> and then log the CANCEL later?
>>
>> cheers
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/03/2006 04:36 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>>>> I've added a couple of fields to the acc table (and am logging 
>>>> additional information to them, e.g., src_ip, some avps, etc.).
>>>> Is the order of the fields in acc relevant?  i.e. if the modparam 
>>>> statement has the fields listed in the order field1, field2, 
>>>> field3, do the columns need to be in the same order?
>>> no, the order is not relevant.
>>>>
>>>> I guess a bigger question is, does my adding columns to acc cause 
>>>> any larger compatibility issues (ignore upgrading acc for a 
>>>> moment.  also, i know, i should have 'em in a different table, 
>>>> etc., etc.)???
>>> openser just writes in acc, there is no compatibility issue that 
>>> implies openser.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at openser.org
>>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>   
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>   
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mahesh.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 319 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060503/cef7f364/attachment.vcf