[Users] Route in INVITE

[Klaus Darilion]

Helge Waastad wrote:
> Hi,
> excellent.
> Now I at least understood my problem.
> 
> I will have a loose_route problem in a "dispatcher/OBP scenario" since
> the route header will not be the proxy it self, but the OBP/Dispatcher
> address, hence a routing loop will occure...
> (Probably Loose routing should be done at OBP layer...I just have to
> figure it out.)

The the OBP is addressed using a pre-loaded route, it should remove the 
Route header and forward it to the main proxy. Maybe the problem is the 
route header:

Route:<OBP>;lr

Is the OBP really inside <> or is this just your formatting?


klaus


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> br hw
> 
> 
> 
> man, 13,.03.2006 kl. 17.35 +0200, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
>> by default, loose_route() function detects the pre-loaded route: if 
>> there is only one Route hdr pointing to the server, it will be consumed 
>> and loose_route() will return false. If more than one Route hdr is 
>> present, the routing will be done as usual - function will consume the 
>> Route and set the destination to the next Route - true is returned.
>>
>> regards,
>> bogdan
>>
>> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>
>>> Helge Waastad writes:
>>>
>>>> I did modify my (a little-bit confused) loose route to loose route only
>>>> INVITES/ACK with totags (has_totag). The rest should be going through
>>>> the normal ACL procedures.
>>> that won't help you with phones line nokia, which add Route header to
>>> INITIAL request (which never have To tags).
>>>
>>> -- juha
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>  
>>>