[Users] internal server error " 500 ".
raviprakash sunkara
sunkara.raviprakash.feb14 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 22 07:02:37 CEST 2006
Hi users,
I'm cracking my head with "500 :-I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred
(1/SL) " .
What's mean this...
When I trying to calls from softphone to softphone " its says above
message '.
openser server ip 192.168.2.4
sip -domain is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
softphones ip are 192.168.2.21 and 20 which behind the NAT ( i.e not in
server location ,its some where place )
please check the marked one in debug.
SIP Request:
0(29266) method: <INVITE>
0(29266) uri: <sip:104 at 24.98.157.209>
0(29266) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=2
0(29266) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
0(29266) Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK1EA935B35FA14629985951EBA8B3F547>; state=16
0(29266) end of header reached, state=5
0(29266) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(29266) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(29266) After parse_msg...
0(29266) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(29266) LOG:- step1
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=100
0(29266) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=9
0(29266) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <t> [25]; uri=[sip:104 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
0(29266) DEBUG: to body [<sip:104 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>
]
0(29266) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <3472> <INVITE>
0(29266) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=200
0(29266) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=149
0(29266) found end of header
0(29266) find_first_route: No Route headers found
0(29266) loose_route: There is no Route HF
0(29266) LOG:- method not reg
0(29266) DEBUG: add_param: tag=612182576
0(29266) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=200
0(29266) find_first_route: No Route headers found
0(29266) loose_route: There is no Route HF
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==11 && xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
== [192.168.2.4]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==13 && xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
== [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) LOG:- uri method myself
0(29266) LOG:- INVITE & ACK IN URI
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) DEBUG:check_content_type: type <application/sdp> found valid
0(29266) record_route(): Double attempt to record-route
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=58
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) DEBUG:check_content_type: type <application/sdp> found valid
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=40
0(29266) force_rtp_proxy2: proxy reply: 35002
0(29266) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=5 , global msg id=0 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=78
0(29266) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=43828, isACK=0
0(29266) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed
0(29266) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(29266) DBG: trans=0xb6123100, callback type 1, id 0 entered
0(29266) DEBUG:tm:t_relay: new INVITE
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) check_via_address(61.17.248.68, 192.168.2.21, 0)
0(29266) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called
0(29266) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: reply sent out. buf=0x81213a0: SIP/2.0
1..., shmem=0xb61247a8: SIP/2.0 1
0(29266) DEBUG:tm:_reply_light: finished
0(29266) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=1000
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) clen_builder: content-length: 187 (187)
0(29266) check_via_address(61.17.248.68, 192.168.2.21, 0)
0(29266) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb612321c
0(29266) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb612322c
0(29266) SER: new transaction fwd'ed
0(29266) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:104 at 192.168.2.20
:5060'
0(29266) lookup(): '104' Not found in usrloc
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==11 && [192.168.2.20]
== [192.168.2.4]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==13 && [192.168.2.20]
== [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==11 && [192.168.2.20]
== [192.168.2.4]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==13 && [192.168.2.20]
== xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
0(29266) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(29266) check_self: host != me
0(29266) LOG:_ uri in uri myself
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=5 , global msg id=5 , T on
entrance=0xb6123100
0(29266) ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in process 0xb6123100
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) check_via_address(61.17.248.68, 192.168.2.21, 0)
0(29266) ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error
occurred (1/SL)
0(29266) LOG:- ENeter into route 1
0(29266) DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=5 , global msg id=5 , T on
entrance=0xb6123100
0(29266) ERROR: t_newtran: transaction already in process 0xb6123100
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(29266) check_via_address(61.17.248.68, 192.168.2.21, 0)
0(29266) ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error
occurred (1/SL)
0(29266) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
0(29266) receive_msg: cleaning up
0(29266) SIP Request:
0(29266) method: <ACK>
0(29266) uri: <sip:104 at 24.98.157.209>
0(29266) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=2
0(29266) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
0(29266) Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK1EA935B35FA14629985951EBA8B3F547>; state=16
0(29266) end of header reached, state=5
0(29266) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(29266) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(29266) After parse_msg...
0(29266) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=8
0(29266) DEBUG: add_param: tag=30901ad8c164fe584bedac02134d4858.65cc
0(29266) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(29266) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <t> [67]; uri=[sip:104 at 24.98.157.209]
0(29266) DEBUG: to body [<sip:104 at 24.98.157.209>]
0(29266) DEBUG: sl_filter_ACK : local ACK found -> dropping it!
0(29266) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
0(29266) receive_msg: cleaning up
0(29266) SIP Request:
0(29266) method: <ACK>
0(29266) uri: <sip:104 at 24.98.157.209>
0(29266) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=2
0(29266) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
0(29266) Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK1EA935B35FA14629985951EBA8B3F547>; state=16
0(29266) end of header reached, state=5
0(29266) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(29266) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(29266) After parse_msg...
0(29266) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(29266) parse_headers: flags=8
0(29266) DEBUG: add_param: tag=30901ad8c164fe584bedac02134d4858.65cc
0(29266) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(29266) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <t> [67]; uri=[sip:104 at 24.98.157.209]
0(29266) DEBUG: to body [<sip:104 at 24.98.157.209>]
0(29266) DEBUG: sl_filter_ACK : local ACK found -> dropping it!
0(29266) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
...............................................................................
openser.cfg
route {
log("LOG:- step1\n");
if(!mf_process_maxfwd_header("13")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too many hops are there ");
exit;
};
if(msg:len>max_len) {
sl_send_reply("513","Messages are Too Big ... !");
exit;
};
# loose_route();
if(!method=="REGISTER") {
log("LOG:- method not reg \n");
record_route();
};
if(loose_route()) {
log("LOG:- loose route\n");
acc_rad_request("200");
t_relay();
exit;
};
if(uri==myself)
{
log("LOG:- uri method myself\n");
if(method=="REGISTER")
{ log("LOG:- REG IN URI MY SELF \n");
if(!www_authorize("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.","subscriber"))
{ log("LOG :- REG IN URI AUTH\n");
www_challenge("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx","0");
exit;
};
save("location");
setflag(6);
force_rport();
exit;
};
if(method=="INVITE"||method=="ACK")
{
log("LOG:- INVITE & ACK IN URI \n");
# if (uri =~ "^sip:1].@*"){
# log("LOG:-rewrite port and host\n");
log("LOG:- Aftere the rewite \n ");
fix_nated_sdp("1");
record_route();
acc_rad_request("Start");
force_rtp_proxy();
t_on_reply("1");
t_relay();
};
if(method=="BYE"||method=="CANCEL")
{
setflag(2);
acc_rad_request("200");
unforce_rtp_proxy();
};
if(!lookup("location"))
{
log("LOG:- NOT IN LOCATION \n");
sl_send_reply("404","sorry guy ... urs friend Not
found");
exit;
};
};
lookup("aliases");
# if (!uri==myself) {
# log("LOG:_ uri in uri myself \n");
# append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
# route(1);
# };
if(!t_relay())
{
sl_reply_error();
};
# lookup("aliases");
# exit;
route(1);
# exit;
}
route[1]
{
log("LOG:- ENeter into route 1\n");
if(isflagset(6))
{
force_rtp_proxy();
};
t_on_reply("1");
if(!t_relay())
{
sl_reply_error();
};
}
onreply_route[1]
{ log("LOG :- reply_route \n");
if(status=~"2[0-9][0-9]" && isflagset(6))
{
log("LOG:- staus 183| 200 \n");
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
};
}
--
Thanks and Regards with cheers
Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer)
Hyperion Technology
www.hyperion-tech.com
<b>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060622/1e7ea15d/attachment.htm
More information about the Users
mailing list