[Users] nat traversal

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 06/19/06 16:52, Padmaja RV wrote:
> Hi,
>     Thanks a lot for the reply... will try to implement the RTP proxy. 
> can you tell me what is the latest RTP Proxy code needed for the 
> openser-1.0.1 and where I can get it from?
snapshots of the cvs are here:
http://www.openser.org/downloads/snapshots/rtpproxy/

If you want to take if from cvs:
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser login
(enter for password)
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser rtpproxy

On some distributions, you can find it as package, check the repository.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> Once again Thank You,
> Regards,
> Padmaja
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" 
> <daniel at voice-system.ro>
> To: "Padmaja RV" <padmaja.rv at vodcalabs.com>
> Cc: <users at openser.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] nat traversal
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> for nathelper you need a separate media relay which is named 
>> rtpproxy. So in both cases you need a second application which can 
>> run on same or separate machine as openser.
>>
>> Choosing between nathelper and mediaproxy is a matter of taste, more 
>> or less. nathelper/rtpproxy are pure C code and they have slightly 
>> more features as mediaproxy module/mediaproxy relay (e.g., nathelper 
>> features OPTIONS natpings and more options to mangle SDP). As 
>> opposite, mediaproxy seems to be easier to use, but mediaproxy relay 
>> is Python and some do not feel comfortable with.
>>
>> The best way is to try both and chose the one which fits better. 
>> Searching on the archive you will find some other opinions, too.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 06/19/06 10:46, Padmaja RV wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>  i need to implement openser for nat traversal. can anyone tell me 
>>> if using nat helper module would be better or using media proxy. 
>>> from so far i read, i understood that mediaproxy needs separate 
>>> installation but does not need to make much change in the existing 
>>> openser.cfg. where as if i use the nathelper, there is no need for 
>>> separate media proxy installation but the openser cfg needs to be 
>>> changed. Please suggest the best way to do it....? also please 
>>> correct me if what i understood is not right......
>>>  Thanks so much,
>>> Padmaja
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>
>