[Users] SER as loadbalancer and NAT

[Andreas Granig]

Hi Klaus!

Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> I wonder if there are known side effects if I use fix_nated_contact() 
>> in combination with nat_flag in the registrar module instead of 
>> fix_nated_register() to save NATed contacts?
> 
> 
> I think the only limitation is, that the SIP client sees a modified URI 
> in incoming INVITE requests and in the 200 Ok responses for the REGISTER 
> messages. I guess most clients do not care, but AFAI remember there was 
> a posting that a client did not accept the 200 Ok reponse with the 
> modified contact.

I faintly remembered this discussion, thus the question.

But I see this approach isn't RFC compliant, so maybe it's better to 
forget this hack and go for a clean Path-Header solution...

Andy