[Serusers] Re: [Users] branch route
aiken.mark at gmail.com
Mon Sep 26 22:17:04 CEST 2005
For me that was not an option. Especially when the same UAs work with other
commercial SBC used for far-end NAT solutions. If you can chose your UAs
then thats great. Liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send
- work for everyone.
On 9/26/05, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:
> Mark Aiken writes:
> > If you want to use the UA to save proprietary dialog/call stateful info
> > this way (in rr params) you will need to carefully test the UAs used in
> > network.
> or simply don't care such UAs, because they are not SIP UAs.
> -- juha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users